lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 02:22:36 +0900
From:   Vincent MAILHOL <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
To:     Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     linux-can <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] can: dev: replace can_priv::ctrlmode_static by can_get_static_ctrlmode()

Hi Marc,

Welcome back on the mailing list, hope you had some nice
holidays! And also thanks a lot for your support over the last
few months on my other series to introduce the TDC netlink
interface :)

Le lun. 25 oct. 2021 à 03:30, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de> a écrit :
>
> On 09.10.2021 22:13:02, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> > The statically enabled features of a CAN controller can be retrieved
> > using below formula:
> >
> > | u32 ctrlmode_static = priv->ctrlmode & ~priv->ctrlmode_supported;
> >
> > As such, there is no need to store this information. This patch remove
> > the field ctrlmode_static of struct can_priv and provides, in
> > replacement, the inline function can_get_static_ctrlmode() which
> > returns the same value.
> >
> > A condition sine qua non for this to work is that the controller
> > static modes should never be set in can_priv::ctrlmode_supported. This
> > is already the case for existing drivers, however, we added a warning
> > message in can_set_static_ctrlmode() to check that.
>
> Please make the can_set_static_ctrlmode to return an error in case of a
> problem. Adjust the drivers using the function is this patch, too.

I didn't do so initially because this is more a static
configuration issue that should only occur during
development. Nonetheless, what you suggest is really simple.

I will just split the patch in two: one of the setter and one for
the getter and address your comments.


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol

Powered by blists - more mailing lists