[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQKm0Ljj-w5PbkAu1ugLFnZRRPt-Vk-J7AhXxDD5xVompA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:10:09 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
"Zhang, Qiang" <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>, robdclark@...omium.org,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com,
mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-Fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] extend task comm from 16 to 24
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 1:33 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com> wrote:
>
> There're many truncated kthreads in the kernel, which may make trouble
> for the user, for example, the user can't get detailed device
> information from the task comm.
>
> This patchset tries to improve this problem fundamentally by extending
> the task comm size from 16 to 24. In order to do that, we have to do
> some cleanups first.
It looks like a churn that doesn't really address the problem.
If we were to allow long names then make it into a pointer and use 16 byte
as an optimized storage for short names. Any longer name would be a pointer.
In other words make it similar to dentry->d_iname.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists