linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH] net: convert users of bitmap_foo() to linkmode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:20:00 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: convert users of bitmap_foo() to
 linkmode_foo()

On Sun, 24 Oct 2021 20:50:45 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 06:41:04PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> > This converts instances of
> > 	bitmap_foo(args..., __ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS)
> > to
> > 	linkmode_foo(args...)  
> 
> It does touch a lot of files, but it does help keep the API uniform.
> 
> > I manually fixed up some lines to prevent them from being excessively
> > long. Otherwise, this change was generated with the following semantic
> > patch:  
> 
> How many did you fix?

Strange, I thought coccinelle does pretty well on checkpatch compliance.

> > Because this touches so many files in the net tree, you may want to
> > generate a new diff using the semantic patch above when you apply this.  
> 
> If it still applies cleanly, i would just apply it.

It seems to apply but does not build (missing include in mlx4?)

> Otherwise maybe Jakub could recreate it?