linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH] net: convert users of bitmap_foo() to linkmode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:36:28 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH] net: convert users of bitmap_foo() to
 linkmode_foo()

On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:26:15 -0400 Sean Anderson wrote:
> >> How many did you fix?  
> >
> > Strange, I thought coccinelle does pretty well on checkpatch compliance.  
> 
> It does, but the problem is there is no obvious place to break
> 
> 	long_function_name(another_long_function_name(and_some_variable)))
> 
> without introducing a variable.

Makes sense now.

> >> If it still applies cleanly, i would just apply it.  
> >
> > It seems to apply but does not build (missing include in mlx4?)  
> 
> Hmm. I tried to determine if the correct headers were included, but it
> looks like there was an error there. In any case, it seems like David
> fixed it up when he applied it.

Ah, you're right! He noted:

    Add missing linux/mii.h include to mellanox. -DaveM

I thought this was not applied since it was marked as "Not applicable"
in patchwork. Let me fix that to say "Accepted".