linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.14 104/169] KVM: nVMX: promptly process interrupts delivered while in guest mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:14:45 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.14 104/169] KVM: nVMX: promptly process interrupts delivered while in guest mode

From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>

commit 3a25dfa67fe40f3a2690af2c562e0947a78bd6a0 upstream.

Since commit c300ab9f08df ("KVM: x86: Replace late check_nested_events() hack with
more precise fix") there is no longer the certainty that check_nested_events()
tries to inject an external interrupt vmexit to L1 on every call to vcpu_enter_guest.
Therefore, even in that case we need to set KVM_REQ_EVENT.  This ensures
that inject_pending_event() is called, and from there kvm_check_nested_events().

Fixes: c300ab9f08df ("KVM: x86: Replace late check_nested_events() hack with more precise fix")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c |   17 ++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -6288,18 +6288,13 @@ static int vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(struct kv
 
 		/*
 		 * If we are running L2 and L1 has a new pending interrupt
-		 * which can be injected, we should re-evaluate
-		 * what should be done with this new L1 interrupt.
-		 * If L1 intercepts external-interrupts, we should
-		 * exit from L2 to L1. Otherwise, interrupt should be
-		 * delivered directly to L2.
+		 * which can be injected, this may cause a vmexit or it may
+		 * be injected into L2.  Either way, this interrupt will be
+		 * processed via KVM_REQ_EVENT, not RVI, because we do not use
+		 * virtual interrupt delivery to inject L1 interrupts into L2.
 		 */
-		if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && max_irr_updated) {
-			if (nested_exit_on_intr(vcpu))
-				kvm_vcpu_exiting_guest_mode(vcpu);
-			else
-				kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
-		}
+		if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && max_irr_updated)
+			kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
 	} else {
 		max_irr = kvm_lapic_find_highest_irr(vcpu);
 	}