[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202110251225.D01841AE67@keescook>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 12:29:46 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Jordy Zomer <jordy@...ing.systems>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] secretmem: Prevent secretmem_users from wrapping to zero
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 07:16:34PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
> Commit 110860541f44 ("mm/secretmem: use refcount_t instead of atomic_t")
> attempted to fix the problem of secretmem_users wrapping to zero and
> allowing suspend once again. Prevent secretmem_users from wrapping to
> zero by forbidding new users if the number of users has wrapped from
> positive to negative. This stops a long way short of reaching the
> necessary 4 billion users, so there's no need to be clever with special
> anti-wrap types or checking the return value from atomic_inc().
I still prefer refcount_t here because it provides deterministic
saturation, but the risk right now is so narrow ("don't hibernate"),
I'm not going to fight for it. I think it'd be fine to use it initialized
to 1, and have the removal check for == 0 as a failure state, which would
deterministically cover the underflow case too.
-Kees
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> Cc: Jordy Zomer <jordy@...ing.systems>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
> Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
> mm/secretmem.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/secretmem.c b/mm/secretmem.c
> index 030f02ddc7c1..c2dda408bb36 100644
> --- a/mm/secretmem.c
> +++ b/mm/secretmem.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(memfd_secret, unsigned int, flags)
>
> if (flags & ~(SECRETMEM_FLAGS_MASK | O_CLOEXEC))
> return -EINVAL;
> + if (atomic_read(&secretmem_users) < 0)
> + return -ENFILE;
>
> fd = get_unused_fd_flags(flags & O_CLOEXEC);
> if (fd < 0)
> --
> 2.33.0
>
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists