[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lf2gg8u0.ffs@tglx>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 22:15:03 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/23] x86/fpu: Add sanity checks for XFD
On Mon, Oct 25 2021 at 10:11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 03:55:19PM -0700, Chang S. Bae wrote:
>> @@ -217,12 +240,15 @@ static inline int xrstor_from_user_sigframe(struct xregs_state __user *buf, u64
>> * Restore xstate from kernel space xsave area, return an error code instead of
>> * an exception.
>> */
>> -static inline int os_xrstor_safe(struct xregs_state *xstate, u64 mask)
>> +static inline int os_xrstor_safe(struct fpstate *fpstate, u64 mask)
>> {
>> + struct xregs_state *xstate = &fpstate->regs.xsave;
>> u32 lmask = mask;
>> u32 hmask = mask >> 32;
>> int err;
>>
>> + /* Must enforce XFD update here */
>> +
>
> <--- something's missing here?
That comment is replaced in the next patch which adds the actual XFD
update. I added it as a reminder. Could probably go away.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists