linux-kernel - Re: problem in changing from active to passive mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110250832080.2938@hadrien>
Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 22:49:54 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
To:     Doug Smythies <dsmythies@...us.net>
cc:     Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: problem in changing from active to passive mode

Thanks for the feedback.  I see that if I change the mode from active to
passive and back to active, I end up in active powersave, not active
performance.  Changing the governor to performance does reproducethe
original performance.

Still, I have the impression that the performance with passive/schedutil
is excessively bad because the frequency is excessively low.  But my
machines are not available at the moment, so I will have to try again
tomorrow to see what exactly is going on.

julia