[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y26gx1se.fsf@disp2133>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:55:13 -0500
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] signal/mips: Update (_save|_restore)_fp_context to fail with -EFAULT
"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk> writes:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2021, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> When an instruction to save or restore a register from the stack fails
>> in _save_fp_context or _restore_fp_context return with -EFAULT. This
>> change was made to r2300_fpu.S[1] but it looks like it got lost with
>> the introduction of EX2[2]. This is also what the other implementation
>> of _save_fp_context and _restore_fp_context in r4k_fpu.S does, and
>> what is needed for the callers to be able to handle the error.
>
> Umm, right, good catch, thanks! I think this ought to be backported.
>
> Acked-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@...am.me.uk>
>
I will add a CC stable. So it can be backported after it is merged.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists