[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <92c26aee-d3eb-258c-a0dd-e09783db6a20@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 23:29:25 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 25 (drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c)
Hi,
On 10/25/21 22:50, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/25/21 2:49 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> There seems to be something amiss with cnosole output in today's release
>> (at least on my ppc qemu boot tests).
>>
>> Changes since 20211022:
>>
>
> on x86_64:
>
> ../drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c: In function ‘amd_pmc_verify_czn_rtc’:
> ../drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c:428:30: error: ‘CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC_DEVICE’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE’?
> rtc_device = rtc_class_open(CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC_DEVICE);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE
Hmm, yes using either CONFIG setting is a problem since it is not always
defined. Both simply default to "rtc0" though and this is also which
standard distro configs use.
Mario, can we just replace CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC_DEVICE with "rtc0"
here to fix this ?
Regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists