[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXZNpLfU0eNbO7ic@gerhold.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:24:36 +0200
From: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: qcom: scm: Don't break compile test on non-ARM
platforms
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 07:58:16PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> The introduction of __qcom_scm_set_boot_addr_mc() relies on
> cpu_logical_map() and MPIDR_AFFINITY_LEVEL() from smp_plat.h, but only
> ARM and ARM64 has this include file, so the introduction of this
> dependency broke compile testing on e.g. x86_64.
>
> Make the inclusion of smp_plat.h and the affected function depend on
> ARM || ARM64 to allow the code to still be compiled.
>
> Fixes: 55845f46df03 ("firmware: qcom: scm: Add support for MC boot address API")
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Sorry about this, I have to say I'm rather surprised that qcom_scm can
be compiled at all on x86_64. It's just a wrapper around ARM SMCs that
don't exist on x86_64 either. :D
But knowing how quickly qcom_scm causes compile problems on random
kernel configurations I'm not going to suggest changing that...
So, this looks good to me. Thanks for fixing it. :)
> ---
> drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> index 7dd9e5e10f23..11464f6502be 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm.c
> @@ -17,7 +17,9 @@
> #include <linux/reset-controller.h>
> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> #include <asm/smp_plat.h>
> +#endif
>
> #include "qcom_scm.h"
>
> @@ -262,6 +264,7 @@ static bool __qcom_scm_is_call_available(struct device *dev, u32 svc_id,
> return ret ? false : !!res.result[0];
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) || defined(CONFIG_ARM64)
> static int __qcom_scm_set_boot_addr_mc(void *entry, const cpumask_t *cpus,
> unsigned int flags)
> {
> @@ -290,6 +293,13 @@ static int __qcom_scm_set_boot_addr_mc(void *entry, const cpumask_t *cpus,
>
> return qcom_scm_call(__scm->dev, &desc, NULL);
> }
> +#else
> +static inline int __qcom_scm_set_boot_addr_mc(void *entry, const cpumask_t *cpus,
> + unsigned int flags)
> +{
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +#endif
>
> static int __qcom_scm_set_warm_boot_addr(void *entry, const cpumask_t *cpus)
> {
> --
> 2.29.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists