linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/aperture: Move conflicting fbdev frame buffer removal to a helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211025075756.3479157-2-javierm@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:57:55 +0200
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Neal Gompa <ngompa13@...il.com>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
        Ville Syrjälä 
        <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
        Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/aperture: Move conflicting fbdev frame buffer removal to a helper

The logic to remove the conflicting frame buffers for fbdev devices that
use a given memory range is only compiled if CONFIG_FB option is enabled.

But having an ifdefery in drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers()
makes the function harder to extend. Move the logic into its own helper.

Suggested-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c
index 74bd4a76b253..1a8ed0c616d6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_aperture.c
@@ -273,6 +273,30 @@ static void drm_aperture_detach_drivers(resource_size_t base, resource_size_t si
 	mutex_unlock(&drm_apertures_lock);
 }
 
+static int drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_fbdev_framebuffers(resource_size_t base,
+							      resource_size_t size, bool primary,
+							      const struct drm_driver *req_driver)
+{
+#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_FB)
+	struct apertures_struct *a;
+	int ret;
+
+	a = alloc_apertures(1);
+	if (!a)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	a->ranges[0].base = base;
+	a->ranges[0].size = size;
+
+	ret = remove_conflicting_framebuffers(a, req_driver->name, primary);
+	kfree(a);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+#endif
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /**
  * drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers - remove existing framebuffers in the given range
  * @base: the aperture's base address in physical memory
@@ -289,23 +313,12 @@ static void drm_aperture_detach_drivers(resource_size_t base, resource_size_t si
 int drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_framebuffers(resource_size_t base, resource_size_t size,
 						 bool primary, const struct drm_driver *req_driver)
 {
-#if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_FB)
-	struct apertures_struct *a;
 	int ret;
 
-	a = alloc_apertures(1);
-	if (!a)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	a->ranges[0].base = base;
-	a->ranges[0].size = size;
-
-	ret = remove_conflicting_framebuffers(a, req_driver->name, primary);
-	kfree(a);
-
+	ret = drm_aperture_remove_conflicting_fbdev_framebuffers(base, size, primary,
+								 req_driver);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-#endif
 
 	drm_aperture_detach_drivers(base, size);
 
-- 
2.31.1