linux-kernel - Re: Do we really need SLOB nowdays?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:15:48 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.de>
To:     Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@...il.com>
cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: Do we really need SLOB nowdays?

On Sun, 17 Oct 2021, Hyeonggon Yoo wrote:

> And one more question:
>     in Christoph's presentation [1], it says SLOB uses
>     300 KB of memory. but on my system it uses almost 8000 KB.
>     what's is differences?

Hmmm.... Someone already made "improvements" to SLOB? Kernel needs to be
compiled for minimal overhead and debugging removed.