| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20211025083315.4752-10-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 08:33:12 +0000
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
arnaldo.melo@...il.com, pmladek@...e.com, peterz@...radead.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, valentin.schneider@....com,
qiang.zhang@...driver.com, robdclark@...omium.org,
christian@...uner.io, dietmar.eggemann@....com, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org, dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com,
mike.marciniszyn@...nelisnetworks.com, dledford@...hat.com,
jgg@...pe.ca
Cc: linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oliver.sang@...el.com, lkp@...el.com,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v6 09/12] tools/perf/test: make perf test adopt to task comm size change
kernel test robot reported a perf-test failure after I extended task comm
size from 16 to 24. The failure as follows,
2021-10-13 18:00:46 sudo /usr/src/perf_selftests-x86_64-rhel-8.3-317419b91ef4eff4e2f046088201e4dc4065caa0/tools/perf/perf test 15
15: Parse sched tracepoints fields : FAILED!
The reason is perf-test requires a fixed-size task comm. If we extend
task comm size to 24, it will not equil with the required size 16 in perf
test.
After some analyzation, I found perf itself can adopt to the size
change, for example, below is the output of perf-sched after I extend
comm size to 24 -
task 614 ( kthreadd: 84), nr_events: 1
task 615 ( systemd: 843), nr_events: 1
task 616 ( networkd-dispat: 1026), nr_events: 1
task 617 ( systemd: 846), nr_events: 1
$ cat /proc/843/comm
networkd-dispatcher
The task comm can be displayed correctly as expected.
Replace old hard-coded 16 with the new one can fix the warning, but we'd
better make the test accept both old and new sizes, then it can be
backward compatibility.
After this patch, the perf-test succeeds no matter task comm is 16 or
24 -
15: Parse sched tracepoints fields : Ok
This patch is a preparation for the followup patch.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Suggested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
---
tools/include/linux/sched.h | 11 +++++++++++
tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/include/linux/sched.h
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/sched.h b/tools/include/linux/sched.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0d575afd7f43
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+#ifndef _TOOLS_LINUX_SCHED_H
+#define _TOOLS_LINUX_SCHED_H
+
+/* Keep both length for backward compatibility */
+enum {
+ TASK_COMM_LEN_16 = 16,
+ TASK_COMM_LEN = 24,
+};
+
+#endif /* _TOOLS_LINUX_SCHED_H */
diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c b/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c
index f9e34bd26cf3..029f2a8c8e51 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/evsel-tp-sched.c
@@ -1,11 +1,13 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <traceevent/event-parse.h>
#include "evsel.h"
#include "tests.h"
#include "debug.h"
-static int evsel__test_field(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name, int size, bool should_be_signed)
+static int evsel__test_field_alt(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name,
+ int size, int alternate_size, bool should_be_signed)
{
struct tep_format_field *field = evsel__field(evsel, name);
int is_signed;
@@ -23,15 +25,24 @@ static int evsel__test_field(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name, int size, bo
ret = -1;
}
- if (field->size != size) {
- pr_debug("%s: \"%s\" size (%d) should be %d!\n",
+ if (field->size != size && field->size != alternate_size) {
+ pr_debug("%s: \"%s\" size (%d) should be %d",
evsel->name, name, field->size, size);
+ if (alternate_size > 0)
+ pr_debug(" or %d", alternate_size);
+ pr_debug("!\n");
ret = -1;
}
return ret;
}
+static int evsel__test_field(struct evsel *evsel, const char *name,
+ int size, bool should_be_signed)
+{
+ return evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, name, size, -1, should_be_signed);
+}
+
int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
{
struct evsel *evsel = evsel__newtp("sched", "sched_switch");
@@ -42,7 +53,8 @@ int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtes
return -1;
}
- if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_comm", 16, false))
+ if (evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, "prev_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN_16,
+ TASK_COMM_LEN, false))
ret = -1;
if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_pid", 4, true))
@@ -54,7 +66,8 @@ int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtes
if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "prev_state", sizeof(long), true))
ret = -1;
- if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_comm", 16, false))
+ if (evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, "next_comm", TASK_COMM_LEN_16,
+ TASK_COMM_LEN, false))
ret = -1;
if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "next_pid", 4, true))
@@ -72,7 +85,8 @@ int test__perf_evsel__tp_sched_test(struct test *test __maybe_unused, int subtes
return -1;
}
- if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "comm", 16, false))
+ if (evsel__test_field_alt(evsel, "comm", TASK_COMM_LEN_16,
+ TASK_COMM_LEN, false))
ret = -1;
if (evsel__test_field(evsel, "pid", 4, true))
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists