[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeLAW6ZBQYidnD7PDYfAH3A2bq+oMJTru-9OW_t-XS26g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 14:31:32 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Kate Hsuan <hpa@...hat.com>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/11] platform/x86: int3472: Add get_sensor_adev_and_name()
helper
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:42 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The discrete.c code is not the only code which needs to lookup the
> acpi_device and device-name for the sensor for which the INT3472
> ACPI-device is a GPIO/clk/regulator provider.
>
> The tps68470.c code also needs this functionality, so factor this
> out into a new get_sensor_adev_and_name() helper.
...
> +int skl_int3472_get_sensor_adev_and_name(struct device *dev,
> + struct acpi_device **sensor_adev_ret,
> + const char **name_ret)
> +{
> + struct acpi_device *adev = ACPI_COMPANION(dev);
> + struct acpi_device *sensor;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + sensor = acpi_dev_get_first_consumer_dev(adev);
> + if (!sensor) {
> + dev_err(dev, "INT3472 seems to have no dependents.\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + *name_ret = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT,
> + acpi_dev_name(sensor));
> + if (!*name_ret)
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (ret == 0 && sensor_adev_ret)
> + *sensor_adev_ret = sensor;
> + else
> + acpi_dev_put(sensor);
> +
> + return ret;
The error path is twisted a bit including far staying ret=0 assignment.
Can it be
int ret;
...
*name_ret = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, I2C_DEV_NAME_FORMAT,
acpi_dev_name(sensor));
if (!*name_ret) {
acpi_dev_put(sensor);
return -ENOMEM;
}
if (sensor_adev_ret)
*sensor_adev_ret = sensor;
return 0;
?
> +}
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists