[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0997d70b-9f28-ba0a-853f-2160922dc722@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:04:02 +0800
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] crypto: use SM3 instead of SM3_256
Hi Jarkko,
On 10/23/21 8:48 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-10-19 at 18:04 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
>> According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
>> SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
>> other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
>>
>> Suggested-by: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst | 2 +-
>> crypto/hash_info.c | 4 ++--
>> drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 2 +-
>> include/crypto/hash_info.h | 2 +-
>> include/uapi/linux/hash_info.h | 3 ++-
>> security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst
>> index 80d5a5af62a1..3292461517f6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst
>> @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ Usage::
>> default 1 (resealing allowed)
>> hash= hash algorithm name as a string. For TPM 1.x the only
>> allowed value is sha1. For TPM 2.x the allowed values
>> - are sha1, sha256, sha384, sha512 and sm3-256.
>> + are sha1, sha256, sha384, sha512 and sm3.
>
> You cannot remove sm3-256 from uapi.
>
Thanks for pointing it out, Maybe this fix is more appropriate in patch 2.
Best regards,
Tianjia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists