[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <335822ac-b98b-1eec-4911-34e4d0e99907@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:34:43 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 39/43] KVM: VMX: Don't do full kick when triggering
posted interrupt "fails"
On 09/10/21 04:12, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> + /*
> + * The smp_wmb() in kvm_make_request() pairs with the smp_mb_*()
> + * after setting vcpu->mode in vcpu_enter_guest(), thus the vCPU
> + * is guaranteed to see the event request if triggering a posted
> + * interrupt "fails" because vcpu->mode != IN_GUEST_MODE.
This explanation doesn't make much sense to me. This is just the usual
request/kick pattern explained in
Documentation/virt/kvm/vcpu-requests.rst; except that we don't bother
with a "kick" out of guest mode because the entry always goes through
kvm_check_request (in the nVMX case) or sync_pir_to_irr (if non-nested)
and completes the delivery itself.
In other word, it is a similar idea as patch 43/43.
What this smp_wmb() pair with, is the smp_mb__after_atomic in
kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu). Setting the interrupt in the
PIR orders before kvm_make_request in this thread, and orders after
kvm_make_request in the vCPU thread.
Here, instead:
> + /*
> + * The implied barrier in pi_test_and_set_on() pairs with the smp_mb_*()
> + * after setting vcpu->mode in vcpu_enter_guest(), thus the vCPU is
> + * guaranteed to see PID.ON=1 and sync the PIR to IRR if triggering a
> + * posted interrupt "fails" because vcpu->mode != IN_GUEST_MODE.
> + */
> if (vcpu != kvm_get_running_vcpu() &&
> !kvm_vcpu_trigger_posted_interrupt(vcpu, false))
> - kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> + kvm_vcpu_wake_up(vcpu);
>
it pairs with the smp_mb__after_atomic in vmx_sync_pir_to_irr(). As
explained again in vcpu-requests.rst, the ON bit has the same function
as vcpu->request in the previous case.
Paolo
> + */
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists