linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfc: port100: fix using -ERRNO as command type mask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:48:21 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-nfc@...ts.01.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfc: port100: fix using -ERRNO as command type mask

On 25/10/2021 16:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> During probing, the driver tries to get a list (mask) of supported
> command types in port100_get_command_type_mask() function.  The value
> is u64 and 0 is treated as invalid mask (no commands supported).  The
> function however returns also -ERRNO as u64 which will be interpret as
> valid command mask.
> 
> Return 0 on every error case of port100_get_command_type_mask(), so the
> probing will stop.
> 
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 0347a6ab300a ("NFC: port100: Commands mechanism implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> ---
>  drivers/nfc/port100.c | 10 +++-------
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/port100.c b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
> index 1296148b4566..ec1630bfedf4 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/port100.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/port100.c
> @@ -1109,15 +1109,11 @@ static u64 port100_get_command_type_mask(struct port100 *dev)
>  
>  	skb = port100_alloc_skb(dev, 0);
>  	if (!skb)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> +		return 0;
>  
> -	nfc_err(&dev->interface->dev, "%s:%d\n", __func__, __LINE__);

Mistake, please ignore.

Best regards,
Krzysztof