linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime Update device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:59:25 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>
Cc:     linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] drivers/acpi: Introduce Platform Firmware Runtime
 Update device driver

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:11:11PM +0800, Chen Yu wrote:
> > > +module_init(pfru_init);
> > > +module_exit(pfru_exit);
> > 
> > module_platform_driver()?
> >
> Currently there are two platform drivers in this file, one is this
> platform driver, another one will be introduced in the subsequent
> patch for telemetry. Since the two platform drivers are treated
> as a whole, they are put into one file. Should I split them
> into two files?

If they bind to different hardware devices, then yes, they should be
separate files as they are not sharing any common code here.

thanks,

greg k-h