lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQK_LWcafdVwB+7aFr2Ow3yOd03e8D6-d13JbMB8=a+QQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:54:53 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: fix fclose/pclose mismatch

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 10:47 AM Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/26/21 8:34 AM, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > Make sure to use pclose() to properly close the pipe opened by popen().
> >
> > Fixes: 81f77fd0deeb ("bpf: add selftest for stackmap with BPF_F_STACK_BUILD_ID")
> > Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
> > ---
> >   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > index cc1cd240445d..e3fea6f281e4 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c
> > @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size)
> >
> >       if (getline(&line, &len, fp) == -1)
> >               goto err;
> > -     fclose(fp);
> > +     pclose(fp);
> >
> >       if (len > size)
> >               len = size;
> > @@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ int extract_build_id(char *build_id, size_t size)
> >       free(line);
> >       return 0;
> >   err:
> > -     fclose(fp);
> > +     pclose(fp);
> >       return -1;
> >   }
> >
> >
>
> Thank you for the patch. The return logic could be simpler
> doing out handling common for error and success path with
> just one call to close. Not related to this change though.
>
> Adding bpf maintainers to the thread

Ohh. That's odd.
I see the patch in:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?delegate=121173
but not in my gmail.
vger is probably slow.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ