[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2223516.ElGaqSPkdT@kreacher>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 21:00:03 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI: scan: Do not set type.bus_address if _HID is valid
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
According to Section 6.1 of ACPI 6.4, it is invalid to provide both
_HID and _ADR for one device at the same time, so modify the code to
set pnp.type.bus_address and pnp.bus_address for a device only if it
has _ADR, but it doesn't have a valid _HID.
Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.4/06_Device_Configuration/Device_Configuration.html#device-identification-objects
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
---
drivers/acpi/scan.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1343,11 +1343,11 @@ static void acpi_set_pnp_ids(acpi_handle
for (i = 0; i < cid_list->count; i++)
acpi_add_id(pnp, cid_list->ids[i].string);
}
- }
- if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_ADR) {
+ } else if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_ADR) {
pnp->bus_address = info->address;
pnp->type.bus_address = 1;
}
+
if (info->valid & ACPI_VALID_UID)
pnp->unique_id = kstrdup(info->unique_id.string,
GFP_KERNEL);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists