lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211026205701.GA1300692@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 16:57:01 -0400
From:   Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:     Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>
Cc:     balbi@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wesley Cheng <wcheng@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: f_mass_storage: Disable eps during
 disconnect

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 12:40:04PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> Hi Alan,
> 
> On 10/26/2021 7:41 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 05:44:56PM -0700, Wesley Cheng wrote:
> >> From: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@...eaurora.org>
> >>
> >> When receiving a disconnect event from the UDC, the mass storage
> >> function driver currently runs the handle_exception() routine
> >> asynchronously.  For UDCs that support runtime PM, there is a
> >> possibility the UDC is already suspended by the time the
> >> do_set_interface() is executed.  This can lead to HW register access
> >> while the UDC is already suspended.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <wcheng@...eaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c
> >> index 3cabf7692ee1..752439690fda 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_mass_storage.c
> >> @@ -2342,6 +2342,16 @@ static void fsg_disable(struct usb_function *f)
> >>  {
> >>  	struct fsg_dev *fsg = fsg_from_func(f);
> >>  
> >> +	/* Disable the endpoints */
> >> +	if (fsg->bulk_in_enabled) {
> >> +		usb_ep_disable(fsg->bulk_in);
> > 
> > According to the kerneldoc, this routine must be called in process 
> > context.
> > 
> >> +		fsg->bulk_in_enabled = 0;
> >> +	}
> >> +	if (fsg->bulk_out_enabled) {
> >> +		usb_ep_disable(fsg->bulk_out);
> >> +		fsg->bulk_out_enabled = 0;
> >> +	}
> >> +
> >>  	__raise_exception(fsg->common, FSG_STATE_CONFIG_CHANGE, NULL);
> >>  }
> > 
> > Looks like you'll have to find a different way to avoid the problem.  
> > For example, if an exception is pending then you might prevent the 
> > gadget from going into runtime suspend until the exception has been 
> > handled.
> > 
> Thanks for the suggestion.  I noticed that a lot of other FDs currently
> call usb_ep_disable() in the disable/disconnect path as well.  Actually,
> f_mass_storage seems to be the only one that doesn't do so.  Maybe we
> should change the kerneldoc :)

You're right; I don't see any real reason why the usb_ep_{en,dis}able 
routines can't run in an atomic context.  So if you to make this change 
to f_mass_storage, you should first submit a patch changing the 
kerneldoc.

Alan Stern

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ