[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de35eedf-8558-233d-ca59-7c636bbb2da3@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:52:41 +0800
From: 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fix & prevent the missing preemption disabling
On 2021/10/26 上午10:42, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:09:12 +0800
> 王贇 <yun.wang@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
>> Just a ping, to see if there are any more comments :-P
>
> I guess you missed what went into mainline (and your name found a bug
> in my perl script for importing patches ;-)
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211019091344.65629198@gandalf.local.home/
Cool~ Missing some chinese font maybe, that's fine :-)
>
> Which means patch 1 needs to change:
>> + /*
>> + * Disable preemption to fulfill the promise.
>> + *
>> + * Don't worry about the bit 0 cases, they indicate
>> + * the disabling behaviour has already been done by
>> + * internal call previously.
>> + */
>> + preempt_disable_notrace();
>> +
>> return bit + 1;
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Preemption will be enabled (if it was previously enabled).
>> + */
>> static __always_inline void trace_clear_recursion(int bit)
>> {
>> if (!bit)
>> return;
>>
>> + if (bit > 0)
>> + preempt_enable_notrace();
>> +
>
> Where this wont work anymore.
>
> Need to preempt disable and enable always.
Yup, will rebase on the latest changes~
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>> barrier();
>> bit--;
>> trace_recursion_clear(bit);
>> @@ -209,7 +227,7 @@ static __always_inline void trace_clear_recursion(int bit)
>> * tracing recursed in the same context (normal vs interrupt),
>> *
Powered by blists - more mailing lists