[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211026032304.30323-1-qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:23:04 +0800
From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com, io-uring@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] io-wq: Remove unnecessary rcu_read_lock/unlock() in raw spinlock critical section
Due to raw_spin_lock/unlock() contains preempt_disable/enable() action,
already regarded as RCU critical region, so remove unnecessary
rcu_read_lock/unlock().
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@...il.com>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index cd88602e2e81..401be005d089 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -855,9 +855,7 @@ static void io_wqe_enqueue(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wq_work *work)
io_wqe_insert_work(wqe, work);
clear_bit(IO_ACCT_STALLED_BIT, &acct->flags);
- rcu_read_lock();
do_create = !io_wqe_activate_free_worker(wqe, acct);
- rcu_read_unlock();
raw_spin_unlock(&wqe->lock);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists