[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXenNR6SX5Jot5Dt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:59:01 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
"Paul E . McKenney " <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Dan Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>, palmer@...belt.com,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 0/3] memory model: Make unlock(A)+lock(B) on the same
CPU RCtso
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 10:54:13PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Boqun Feng (3):
> tools/memory-model: Provide extra ordering for unlock+lock pair on the
> same CPU
> tools/memory-model: doc: Describe the requirement of the litmus-tests
> directory
> tools/memory-model: litmus: Add two tests for unlock(A)+lock(B)
> ordering
I'm obviously all in favour of this :-)
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists