[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20211026075626.61975-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 15:56:24 +0800
From: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: James Bottomley <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>,
Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@...hat.com>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/2] use SM3 instead of SM3_256
According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
---
v3 changes:
- The fix of document trusted-encrypted.rst is put in patch 2
v2 changes:
- an additional macro with the same value is defined for uapi instead
of renaming directly
Tianjia Zhang (2):
crypto: use SM3 instead of SM3_256
tpm: use SM3 instead of SM3_256
Documentation/security/keys/trusted-encrypted.rst | 2 +-
crypto/hash_info.c | 4 ++--
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-sysfs.c | 4 ++--
drivers/char/tpm/tpm2-cmd.c | 2 +-
include/crypto/hash_info.h | 2 +-
include/linux/tpm.h | 2 +-
include/uapi/linux/hash_info.h | 3 ++-
security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_tpm2.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--
2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7
Powered by blists - more mailing lists