[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877de0aycg.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:12:47 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
catalin.marinas@....com, deanbo422@...il.com, green.hu@...il.com,
guoren@...nel.org, jonas@...thpole.se, kernelfans@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...linux.org.uk,
nickhu@...estech.com, palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
shorne@...il.com, stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi,
tglx@...utronix.de, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, vgupta@...nel.org,
vladimir.murzin@....com, will@...nel.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/17] irq: remove handle_domain_{irq,nmi}()
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:24:47 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com> wrote:
>
> The handle_domain_{irq,nmi}() functions were oringally intended as a
> convenience, but recent rework to entry code across the kernel tree has
> demonstrated that they cause more pain than they're worth and prevent
> architectures from being able to write robust entry code.
>
> This series reworks the irq code to remove them, handling the necessary
> entry work consistently in entry code (be it architectural or generic).
>
> Marc, on the assumption you'll take this into the irqchip tree, I've pushed
> this out to my kernel.org repo, tagged as remove-handle-domain-irq-20211026,
> which should be commit:
>
> 0953fb263714e1c8 ("irq: remove handle_domain_{irq,nmi}() (2021-10-26 10:13:31 +0100)")
I've pulled this into the irq/irqchip-next branch, and it will
hopefully hit -next tomorrow.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists