[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXfaAfSfPTaTTpVf@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 11:35:45 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Luo Jie <luoj@...eaurora.org>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fixed warning: Function parameter not described
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 06:29:57PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote:
> Fixed warning: Function parameter or member 'enable' not
> described in 'genphy_c45_fast_retrain'
>
> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <luoj@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> index b01180e1f578..db709d30bf84 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
> @@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genphy_c45_loopback);
> /**
> * genphy_c45_fast_retrain - configure fast retrain registers
> * @phydev: target phy_device struct
> + * @enable: enable fast retrain or not
> *
> * Description: If fast-retrain is enabled, we configure PHY as
> * advertising fast retrain capable and THP Bypass Request, then
Patch itself is fine, but I wonder why we've started getting
Description: prefixes on new functions in this file whereas the
bulk of the descriptions in the file do not use that prefix.
In any case, for this patch:
Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists