| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YXflRbBkvtBeQvA4@unreal>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:23:49 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Alaa Hleihel <alaa@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND rdma-rc] RDMA/mlx5: Add dummy umem to IB_MR_TYPE_DM
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 02:31:50PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 01:23:13PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > From: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@...dia.com>
> >
> > After the cited patch, and for the case of IB_MR_TYPE_DM that doesn't
> > have a umem (even though it is a user MR), function mlx5_free_priv_descs()
> > will think that it's a kernel MR, leading to wrongly accessing mr->descs
> > that will get wrong values in the union which leads to attempting to
> > release resources that were not allocated in the first place.
> >
> > For example:
> > DMA-API: mlx5_core 0000:08:00.1: device driver tries to free DMA memory it has not allocated [device address=0x0000000000000000] [size=0 bytes]
> > WARNING: CPU: 8 PID: 1021 at kernel/dma/debug.c:961 check_unmap+0x54f/0x8b0
> > RIP: 0010:check_unmap+0x54f/0x8b0
> > Call Trace:
> > debug_dma_unmap_page+0x57/0x60
> > mlx5_free_priv_descs+0x57/0x70 [mlx5_ib]
> > mlx5_ib_dereg_mr+0x1fb/0x3d0 [mlx5_ib]
> > ib_dereg_mr_user+0x60/0x140 [ib_core]
> > uverbs_destroy_uobject+0x59/0x210 [ib_uverbs]
> > uobj_destroy+0x3f/0x80 [ib_uverbs]
> > ib_uverbs_cmd_verbs+0x435/0xd10 [ib_uverbs]
> > ? uverbs_finalize_object+0x50/0x50 [ib_uverbs]
> > ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2e0
> > ? lock_acquired+0x12/0x380
> > ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2e0
> > ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2e0
> > ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x7c/0x140 [ib_uverbs]
> > ? lock_release+0x28a/0x400
> > ib_uverbs_ioctl+0xc0/0x140 [ib_uverbs]
> > ? ib_uverbs_ioctl+0x7c/0x140 [ib_uverbs]
> > __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7f/0xb0
> > do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
> >
> > Fix it by adding a dummy umem to IB_MR_TYPE_DM MRs.
> >
> > Fixes: f18ec4223117 ("RDMA/mlx5: Use a union inside mlx5_ib_mr")
> > Signed-off-by: Alaa Hleihel <alaa@...dia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> > RESEND: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9c6478b70dc23cfec3a7bfc345c30ff817e7e799.1631660866.git.leonro@nvidia.com
> >
> > Our request to drop that original patch was because mr-->umem pointer is checked
> > in rereg flow for the DM MRs with expectation to have NULL there. However DM is
> > blocked for the rereg path in the commit 5ccbf63f87a3 ("IB/uverbs: Prevent
> > reregistration of DM_MR to regular MR"), and the checks in mlx5_ib are redundant.
>
> That logic in the core code is bogus and should be deleted.
>
> It is perfeclty fine to use rereg to change the access flags on a DM
> MR and mlx5 now implements that.
>
> So let's not go down a path that blocks it.
>
> Like this instead:
Thanks, let's give a try.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> index e636e954f6bf2a..4a7a56ed740b9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
> @@ -664,7 +664,6 @@ struct mlx5_ib_mr {
>
> /* User MR data */
> struct mlx5_cache_ent *cache_ent;
> - struct ib_umem *umem;
>
> /* This is zero'd when the MR is allocated */
> union {
> @@ -676,7 +675,7 @@ struct mlx5_ib_mr {
> struct list_head list;
> };
>
> - /* Used only by kernel MRs (umem == NULL) */
> + /* Used only by kernel MRs */
> struct {
> void *descs;
> void *descs_alloc;
> @@ -697,8 +696,9 @@ struct mlx5_ib_mr {
> int data_length;
> };
>
> - /* Used only by User MRs (umem != NULL) */
> + /* Used only by User MRs */
> struct {
> + struct ib_umem *umem;
> unsigned int page_shift;
> /* Current access_flags */
> int access_flags;
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> index 221f0949794e35..997d133d00369d 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> @@ -1904,19 +1904,19 @@ mlx5_alloc_priv_descs(struct ib_device *device,
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static void
> -mlx5_free_priv_descs(struct mlx5_ib_mr *mr)
> +static void mlx5_free_priv_descs(struct mlx5_ib_mr *mr)
> {
> - if (!mr->umem && mr->descs) {
> - struct ib_device *device = mr->ibmr.device;
> - int size = mr->max_descs * mr->desc_size;
> - struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(device);
> + struct ib_device *device = mr->ibmr.device;
> + int size = mr->max_descs * mr->desc_size;
> + struct mlx5_ib_dev *dev = to_mdev(device);
>
> - dma_unmap_single(&dev->mdev->pdev->dev, mr->desc_map, size,
> - DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> - kfree(mr->descs_alloc);
> - mr->descs = NULL;
> - }
> + if (!mr->descs)
> + return;
> +
> + dma_unmap_single(&dev->mdev->pdev->dev, mr->desc_map, size,
> + DMA_TO_DEVICE);
> + kfree(mr->descs_alloc);
> + mr->descs = NULL;
> }
>
> int mlx5_ib_dereg_mr(struct ib_mr *ibmr, struct ib_udata *udata)
> @@ -1978,7 +1978,7 @@ int mlx5_ib_dereg_mr(struct ib_mr *ibmr, struct ib_udata *udata)
> return rc;
> }
>
> - if (mr->umem) {
> + if (udata && mr->umem) {
> bool is_odp = is_odp_mr(mr);
>
> if (!is_odp)
> @@ -1992,7 +1992,8 @@ int mlx5_ib_dereg_mr(struct ib_mr *ibmr, struct ib_udata *udata)
> if (mr->cache_ent) {
> mlx5_mr_cache_free(dev, mr);
> } else {
> - mlx5_free_priv_descs(mr);
> + if (!udata)
> + mlx5_free_priv_descs(mr);
> kfree(mr);
> }
> return 0;
> @@ -2079,7 +2080,6 @@ static struct mlx5_ib_mr *mlx5_ib_alloc_pi_mr(struct ib_pd *pd,
> if (err)
> goto err_free_in;
>
> - mr->umem = NULL;
> kfree(in);
>
> return mr;
> @@ -2206,7 +2206,6 @@ static struct ib_mr *__mlx5_ib_alloc_mr(struct ib_pd *pd,
> }
>
> mr->ibmr.device = pd->device;
> - mr->umem = NULL;
>
> switch (mr_type) {
> case IB_MR_TYPE_MEM_REG:
Powered by blists - more mailing lists