[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20211025210843.36fe2829@rorschach.local.home>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 21:08:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 04/20] trace/osnoise: Use
start/stop_per_cpu_kthreads() on osnoise_cpus_write()
On Mon, 25 Oct 2021 19:40:29 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org> wrote:
> When writing a new CPU mask via osnoise/cpus, if the tracer is running,
> the workload is restarted to follow the new cpumask. The restart is
> currently done using osnoise_workload_start/stop(), which disables the
> workload *and* the instrumentation. However, disabling the
> instrumentation is not necessary.
>
> Calling start/stop_per_cpu_kthreads() is enough to apply the new
> osnoise/cpus config.
>
> No functional change.
I nuked the "No functional change.". You can't have the changes of the
above and say there wasn't functional changes, as the first paragraph
explains the functional changes.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists