lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e2c14d5-0d9c-e288-f2c6-0b29c5ce93e0@quicinc.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 21:00:17 +0800
From:   Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
To:     "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Luo Jie <luoj@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fixed warning: Function parameter not described


On 10/26/2021 6:35 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 06:29:57PM +0800, Luo Jie wrote:
>> Fixed warning: Function parameter or member 'enable' not
>> described in 'genphy_c45_fast_retrain'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luo Jie <luoj@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
>> index b01180e1f578..db709d30bf84 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c
>> @@ -614,6 +614,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(genphy_c45_loopback);
>>   /**
>>    * genphy_c45_fast_retrain - configure fast retrain registers
>>    * @phydev: target phy_device struct
>> + * @enable: enable fast retrain or not
>>    *
>>    * Description: If fast-retrain is enabled, we configure PHY as
>>    *   advertising fast retrain capable and THP Bypass Request, then
> Patch itself is fine, but I wonder why we've started getting
> Description: prefixes on new functions in this file whereas the
> bulk of the descriptions in the file do not use that prefix.

Thanks Russell for the review. i see the prefix "Description" is also 
used in the

file phy.c.

> In any case, for this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
>
> Thanks.
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ