linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the powerpc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:27:51 -0400
From:   Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the audit tree with the powerpc tree

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 6:55 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the audit tree got conflicts in:
> >
> >   arch/powerpc/kernel/audit.c
> >   arch/powerpc/kernel/compat_audit.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> >   566af8cda399 ("powerpc/audit: Convert powerpc to AUDIT_ARCH_COMPAT_GENERIC")
> >
> > from the powerpc tree and commits:
> >
> >   42f355ef59a2 ("audit: replace magic audit syscall class numbers with macros")
> >   1c30e3af8a79 ("audit: add support for the openat2 syscall")
> >
> > from the audit tree.
>
> Thanks.
>
> I guess this is OK, unless the audit folks disagree. I could revert the
> powerpc commit and try it again later.
>
> If I don't hear anything I'll leave it as-is.

Hi Michael,

Last I recall from the powerpc/audit thread there were still some
issues with audit working properly in your testing, has that been
resolved?  If nothing else, -rc7 seems a bit late for this to hit
-next for me to feel comfortable about this.

-- 
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com