lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gb6vN9kHeQbgjRQXvOCNaFK8ur7bLDeAVjDqdT2=a+-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:39:53 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) SUBSYSTEM:" 
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC..." 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] PM / wakeirq: support enabling wake-up irq after
 runtime_suspend called

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 9:02 AM Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com> wrote:
>
> When the dedicated wake IRQ is level trigger, and it uses the
> device's low-power status as the wakeup source, that means if the
> device is not in low-power state, the wake IRQ will be triggered
> if enabled; For this case, need enable the wake IRQ after running
> the device's ->runtime_suspend() which make it enter low-power state.
>
> e.g.
> Assume the wake IRQ is a low level trigger type, and the wakeup
> signal comes from the low-power status of the device.
> The wakeup signal is low level at running time (0), and becomes
> high level when the device enters low-power state (runtime_suspend
> (1) is called), a wakeup event at (2) make the device exit low-power
> state, then the wakeup signal also becomes low level.
>
>                 ------------------
>                |           ^     ^|
> ----------------           |     | --------------
>  |<---(0)--->|<--(1)--|   (3)   (2)    (4)
>
> if enable the wake IRQ before running runtime_suspend during (0),
> a wake IRQ will arise, it causes resume immediately;
> it works if enable wake IRQ ( e.g. at (3) or (4)) after running
> ->runtime_suspend().
>
> This patch introduces a new status WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE to
> optionally support enabling wake IRQ after running ->runtime_suspend().
>
> Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun <chunfeng.yun@...iatek.com>

I don't really have anything to add regarding the code.

The kerneldoc comments could be improved, but I can take care of this
when applying the patch.

Please collect ACKs for the remaining 2 patches in the series and I
will pick up all three.

Thanks!

> ---
> v4: changes according to Rafael's suggestions
>     1. rename new flag as WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE;
>     2. add __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() with flag parameter, then
>        rebuild dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq() and add new api
>        dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse();
>     3. rename the new added parameter as cond_disable in
>        dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(), and also simplify its flow;
>     4. modify some comments
>
> v3: add new status suggested by Rafael
>
> v2: add more commit message
>
>   Use the falling edge trigger interrupt suggested by Ikjoon [1], it
> works well at firstly when only use this related wakeup source, but
> encounter issues if use other wakeup sources to wakeup platform as
> below steps:
> 1. use another wakeup source to wake up the suspended system;
> 2. the consumer's resume() will be called, and exits sleep state;
> 3. the consumer's wakeup signal will fall into low level, due to
>    currently the wakeup irq is disabled, the wake-irq is pending;
> 4. the consumer tries to enter runtime suspend, but there is a
>    pending wakeup irq, so will resume again, this will repeat
>    endlessly.
>
>   Send out the patch again for further discussion.
>
> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/12190407
>
> ---
>  drivers/base/power/power.h   |   7 ++-
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c |   6 ++-
>  drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  include/linux/pm_wakeirq.h   |   9 +++-
>  4 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/power.h b/drivers/base/power/power.h
> index 54292cdd7808..0eb7f02b3ad5 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/power.h
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/power.h
> @@ -25,8 +25,10 @@ extern u64 pm_runtime_active_time(struct device *dev);
>
>  #define WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED   BIT(0)
>  #define WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED     BIT(1)
> +#define WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE     BIT(2)
>  #define WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK                (WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED | \
> -                                        WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED)
> +                                        WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED | \
> +                                        WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE)
>
>  struct wake_irq {
>         struct device *dev;
> @@ -39,7 +41,8 @@ extern void dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(struct wake_irq *wirq);
>  extern void dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq(struct wake_irq *wirq);
>  extern void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev,
>                                          bool can_change_status);
> -extern void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev);
> +extern void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev, bool cond_disable);
> +extern void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_complete(struct device *dev);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> index ec94049442b9..d504cd4ab3cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -645,6 +645,8 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
>         if (retval)
>                 goto fail;
>
> +       dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_complete(dev);
> +
>   no_callback:
>         __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
>         pm_runtime_deactivate_timer(dev);
> @@ -690,7 +692,7 @@ static int rpm_suspend(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
>         return retval;
>
>   fail:
> -       dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev);
> +       dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev, true);
>         __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_ACTIVE);
>         dev->power.deferred_resume = false;
>         wake_up_all(&dev->power.wait_queue);
> @@ -873,7 +875,7 @@ static int rpm_resume(struct device *dev, int rpmflags)
>
>         callback = RPM_GET_CALLBACK(dev, runtime_resume);
>
> -       dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev);
> +       dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(dev, false);
>         retval = rpm_callback(callback, dev);
>         if (retval) {
>                 __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
> index b91a3a9bf9f6..76c163a89104 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeirq.c
> @@ -142,24 +142,7 @@ static irqreturn_t handle_threaded_wake_irq(int irq, void *_wirq)
>         return IRQ_HANDLED;
>  }
>
> -/**
> - * dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq - Request a dedicated wake-up interrupt
> - * @dev: Device entry
> - * @irq: Device wake-up interrupt
> - *
> - * Unless your hardware has separate wake-up interrupts in addition
> - * to the device IO interrupts, you don't need this.
> - *
> - * Sets up a threaded interrupt handler for a device that has
> - * a dedicated wake-up interrupt in addition to the device IO
> - * interrupt.
> - *
> - * The interrupt starts disabled, and needs to be managed for
> - * the device by the bus code or the device driver using
> - * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq() and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq()
> - * functions.
> - */
> -int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> +static int __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq, unsigned int flag)
>  {
>         struct wake_irq *wirq;
>         int err;
> @@ -197,7 +180,7 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
>         if (err)
>                 goto err_free_irq;
>
> -       wirq->status = WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED;
> +       wirq->status = WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_ALLOCATED | flag;
>
>         return err;
>
> @@ -210,8 +193,57 @@ int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
>
>         return err;
>  }
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq - Request a dedicated wake-up interrupt
> + * @dev: Device entry
> + * @irq: Device wake-up interrupt
> + *
> + * Unless your hardware has separate wake-up interrupts in addition
> + * to the device IO interrupts, you don't need this.
> + *
> + * Sets up a threaded interrupt handler for a device that has
> + * a dedicated wake-up interrupt in addition to the device IO
> + * interrupt.
> + *
> + * The interrupt starts disabled, and needs to be managed for
> + * the device by the bus code or the device driver using
> + * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq*() and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq*()
> + * functions.
> + */
> +int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
> +{
> +       return __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq, 0);
> +}
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq);
>
> +/**
> + * dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse - Request a dedicated wake-up interrupt
> + *       with setting flag WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE
> + * @dev: Device entry
> + * @irq: Device wake-up interrupt
> + *
> + * Unless your hardware has separate wake-up interrupts in addition
> + * to the device IO interrupts, you don't need this.
> + *
> + * Sets up a threaded interrupt handler for a device that has a dedicated
> + * wake-up interrupt in addition to the device IO interrupt. It sets
> + * the status of WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE to tell rpm_suspend()
> + * to enable dedicated wake-up interrupt after running the
> + * ->runtime_suspend()
> + *
> + * The interrupt starts disabled, and needs to be managed for
> + * the device by the bus code or the device driver using
> + * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq*() and dev_pm_disable_wake_irq*()
> + * functions.
> + */
> +int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse(struct device *dev, int irq)
> +{
> +       return __dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(dev, irq, WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse);
> +
>  /**
>   * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq - Enable device wake-up interrupt
>   * @dev: Device
> @@ -282,27 +314,54 @@ void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev,
>         return;
>
>  enable:
> -       enable_irq(wirq->irq);
> +       if (!can_change_status || !(wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE))
> +               enable_irq(wirq->irq);
>  }
>
>  /**
>   * dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check - Checks and disables wake-up interrupt
>   * @dev: Device
> + * @cond_disable: if set, also check WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE
>   *
>   * Disables wake-up interrupt conditionally based on status.
>   * Should be only called from rpm_suspend() and rpm_resume() path.
>   */
> -void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev)
> +void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq_check(struct device *dev, bool cond_disable)
>  {
>         struct wake_irq *wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
>
>         if (!wirq || !(wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK))
>                 return;
>
> +       if (cond_disable && (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE))
> +               return;
> +
>         if (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED)
>                 disable_irq_nosync(wirq->irq);
>  }
>
> +/**
> + * dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_complete - enable wake IRQ not enabled before
> + * @dev: Device using the wake IRQ
> + *
> + * Enable wake IRQ conditionally based on status, mainly used if want to
> + * enable wake IRQ after running ->runtime_suspend() which depends on
> + * WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE.
> + *
> + * Should be only called from rpm_suspend() path.
> + */
> +void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq_complete(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       struct wake_irq *wirq = dev->power.wakeirq;
> +
> +       if (!wirq || !(wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MASK))
> +               return;
> +
> +       if (wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_MANAGED &&
> +           wirq->status & WAKE_IRQ_DEDICATED_REVERSE)
> +               enable_irq(wirq->irq);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * dev_pm_arm_wake_irq - Arm device wake-up
>   * @wirq: Device wake-up interrupt
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_wakeirq.h b/include/linux/pm_wakeirq.h
> index cd5b62db9084..e63a63aa47a3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_wakeirq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_wakeirq.h
> @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>
>  extern int dev_pm_set_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq);
> -extern int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev,
> -                                        int irq);
> +extern int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq);
> +extern int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse(struct device *dev, int irq);
>  extern void dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(struct device *dev);
>  extern void dev_pm_enable_wake_irq(struct device *dev);
>  extern void dev_pm_disable_wake_irq(struct device *dev);
> @@ -35,6 +35,11 @@ static inline int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq(struct device *dev, int irq)
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static inline int dev_pm_set_dedicated_wake_irq_reverse(struct device *dev, int irq)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static inline void dev_pm_clear_wake_irq(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  }
> --
> 2.18.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ