| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:52:29 -0700
From: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Nathan Tempelman <natet@...gle.com>,
Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>,
Steve Rutherford <srutherford@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@...e.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/16] KVM: selftests: move vm_phy_pages_alloc() earlier in file
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 8:47 PM Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 08:00:00AM -0700, Mingwei Zhang wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 4:46 PM Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Subsequent patches will break some of this code out into file-local
> > > helper functions, which will be used by functions like vm_vaddr_alloc(),
> > > which currently are defined earlier in the file, so a forward
> > > declaration would be needed.
> > >
> > > Instead, move it earlier in the file, just above vm_vaddr_alloc() and
> > > and friends, which are the main users.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
> > > ---
> > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 146 ++++++++++-----------
> > > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> > > index 10a8ed691c66..92f59adddebe 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> > > @@ -1145,6 +1145,79 @@ void vm_vcpu_add(struct kvm_vm *vm, uint32_t vcpuid)
> > > list_add(&vcpu->list, &vm->vcpus);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Physical Contiguous Page Allocator
> > > + *
> > > + * Input Args:
> > > + * vm - Virtual Machine
> > > + * num - number of pages
> > > + * paddr_min - Physical address minimum
> > > + * memslot - Memory region to allocate page from
> > > + *
> > > + * Output Args: None
> > > + *
> > > + * Return:
> > > + * Starting physical address
> > > + *
> > > + * Within the VM specified by vm, locates a range of available physical
> > > + * pages at or above paddr_min. If found, the pages are marked as in use
> > > + * and their base address is returned. A TEST_ASSERT failure occurs if
> > > + * not enough pages are available at or above paddr_min.
> > > + */
> > > +vm_paddr_t vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num,
> > > + vm_paddr_t paddr_min, uint32_t memslot)
> > > +{
> > > + struct userspace_mem_region *region;
> > > + sparsebit_idx_t pg, base;
> > > +
> > > + TEST_ASSERT(num > 0, "Must allocate at least one page");
> > > +
> > > + TEST_ASSERT((paddr_min % vm->page_size) == 0, "Min physical address "
> > > + "not divisible by page size.\n"
> > > + " paddr_min: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%x",
> > > + paddr_min, vm->page_size);
> > > +
> > > + region = memslot2region(vm, memslot);
> > > + base = pg = paddr_min >> vm->page_shift;
> > > +
> > > + do {
> > > + for (; pg < base + num; ++pg) {
> > > + if (!sparsebit_is_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg)) {
> > > + base = pg = sparsebit_next_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg);
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + } while (pg && pg != base + num);
> > > +
> > > + if (pg == 0) {
> > > + fprintf(stderr, "No guest physical page available, "
> > > + "paddr_min: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%x memslot: %u\n",
> > > + paddr_min, vm->page_size, memslot);
> > > + fputs("---- vm dump ----\n", stderr);
> > > + vm_dump(stderr, vm, 2);
> > > + abort();
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + for (pg = base; pg < base + num; ++pg)
> > > + sparsebit_clear(region->unused_phy_pages, pg);
> > > +
> > > + return base * vm->page_size;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +vm_paddr_t vm_phy_page_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t paddr_min,
> > > + uint32_t memslot)
> > > +{
> > > + return vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, 1, paddr_min, memslot);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +/* Arbitrary minimum physical address used for virtual translation tables. */
> > > +#define KVM_GUEST_PAGE_TABLE_MIN_PADDR 0x180000
> > > +
> > > +vm_paddr_t vm_alloc_page_table(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> > > +{
> > > + return vm_phy_page_alloc(vm, KVM_GUEST_PAGE_TABLE_MIN_PADDR, 0);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * VM Virtual Address Unused Gap
> > > *
> > > @@ -2149,79 +2222,6 @@ const char *exit_reason_str(unsigned int exit_reason)
> > > return "Unknown";
> > > }
> > >
> > > -/*
> > > - * Physical Contiguous Page Allocator
> > > - *
> > > - * Input Args:
> > > - * vm - Virtual Machine
> > > - * num - number of pages
> > > - * paddr_min - Physical address minimum
> > > - * memslot - Memory region to allocate page from
> > > - *
> > > - * Output Args: None
> > > - *
> > > - * Return:
> > > - * Starting physical address
> > > - *
> > > - * Within the VM specified by vm, locates a range of available physical
> > > - * pages at or above paddr_min. If found, the pages are marked as in use
> > > - * and their base address is returned. A TEST_ASSERT failure occurs if
> > > - * not enough pages are available at or above paddr_min.
> > > - */
> > > -vm_paddr_t vm_phy_pages_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, size_t num,
> > > - vm_paddr_t paddr_min, uint32_t memslot)
> > > -{
> > > - struct userspace_mem_region *region;
> > > - sparsebit_idx_t pg, base;
> > > -
> > > - TEST_ASSERT(num > 0, "Must allocate at least one page");
> > > -
> > > - TEST_ASSERT((paddr_min % vm->page_size) == 0, "Min physical address "
> > > - "not divisible by page size.\n"
> > > - " paddr_min: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%x",
> > > - paddr_min, vm->page_size);
> > > -
> > > - region = memslot2region(vm, memslot);
> > > - base = pg = paddr_min >> vm->page_shift;
> > > -
> > > - do {
> > > - for (; pg < base + num; ++pg) {
> > > - if (!sparsebit_is_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg)) {
> > > - base = pg = sparsebit_next_set(region->unused_phy_pages, pg);
> > > - break;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > - } while (pg && pg != base + num);
> > > -
> > > - if (pg == 0) {
> > > - fprintf(stderr, "No guest physical page available, "
> > > - "paddr_min: 0x%lx page_size: 0x%x memslot: %u\n",
> > > - paddr_min, vm->page_size, memslot);
> > > - fputs("---- vm dump ----\n", stderr);
> > > - vm_dump(stderr, vm, 2);
> > > - abort();
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - for (pg = base; pg < base + num; ++pg)
> > > - sparsebit_clear(region->unused_phy_pages, pg);
> > > -
> > > - return base * vm->page_size;
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -vm_paddr_t vm_phy_page_alloc(struct kvm_vm *vm, vm_paddr_t paddr_min,
> > > - uint32_t memslot)
> > > -{
> > > - return vm_phy_pages_alloc(vm, 1, paddr_min, memslot);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > -/* Arbitrary minimum physical address used for virtual translation tables. */
> > > -#define KVM_GUEST_PAGE_TABLE_MIN_PADDR 0x180000
> > > -
> > > -vm_paddr_t vm_alloc_page_table(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> > > -{
> > > - return vm_phy_page_alloc(vm, KVM_GUEST_PAGE_TABLE_MIN_PADDR, 0);
> > > -}
> > > -
> > > /*
> > > * Address Guest Virtual to Host Virtual
> > > *
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >
> > Why move the function implementation? Maybe just adding a declaration
> > at the top of kvm_util.c should suffice.
>
> At least from working on other projects I'd gotten the impression that
> forward function declarations should be avoided if they can be solved by
> moving the function above the caller. Certainly don't mind taking your
> suggestion and dropping this patch if that's not the case here though.
Understood. Yes, I think it would be better to follow your experience
then. I was thinking that if you move the code and then potentially
git blame on that function might point to you :)
Thanks.
-Mingwei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists