lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a37ede61-c607-4fcf-2be4-12b83cdf0d7e@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:03:02 -0700
From:   Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/6] perf intel-pt: Support itrace A option to
 approximate IPC


On 10/26/2021 2:01 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> Normally, for cycle-acccurate mode, IPC values are an exact number of
> instructions and cycles. Due to the granularity of timestamps, that happens
> only when a CYC packet correlates to the event.
>
> Support the itrace 'A' option, to use instead, the number of cycles
> associated with the current timestamp. This provides IPC information for
> every change of timestamp, but at the expense of accuracy.

Can you expand a bit what exactly the accuracy loss it?

Would be good to describe that in the manpage too.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ