linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/6] Input: zinitix - Handle proper supply names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211027181350.91630-4-nikita@trvn.ru>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 23:13:47 +0500
From:   Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
To:     dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, Michael.Srba@...nam.cz,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] Input: zinitix - Handle proper supply names

From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

The supply names of the Zinitix touchscreen were a bit confused, the new
bindings rectifies this.

To deal with old and new devicetrees, first check if we have "vddo" and in
case that exists assume the old supply names. Else go and look for the new
ones.

We cannot just get the regulators since we would get an OK and a dummy
regulator: we need to check explicitly for the old supply name.

Use struct device *dev as a local variable instead of the I2C client since
the device is what we are actually obtaining the resources from.

Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Srba <Michael.Srba@...nam.cz>
Cc: phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
[Slightly changed the legacy regulator detection]
Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
---
This patch was previously submitted here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/20210625113435.2539282-2-linus.walleij@linaro.org/

Changes since the original patch:
 - Adress the review comments by Dmitry:
   Drop explict OF check and use of_find_property()
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c
index 1e70b8d2a8d7..d4e06a88a883 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/zinitix.c
@@ -252,16 +252,27 @@ static int zinitix_init_touch(struct bt541_ts_data *bt541)
 
 static int zinitix_init_regulators(struct bt541_ts_data *bt541)
 {
-	struct i2c_client *client = bt541->client;
+	struct device *dev = &bt541->client->dev;
 	int error;
 
-	bt541->supplies[0].supply = "vdd";
-	bt541->supplies[1].supply = "vddo";
-	error = devm_regulator_bulk_get(&client->dev,
+	/*
+	 * Some older device trees have erroneous names for the regulators,
+	 * so check if "vddo" is present and in that case use these names
+	 * and warn. Else use the proper supply names on the component.
+	 */
+	if (of_find_property(dev->of_node, "vddo-supply", NULL)) {
+		bt541->supplies[0].supply = "vdd";
+		bt541->supplies[1].supply = "vddo";
+	} else {
+		/* Else use the proper supply names */
+		bt541->supplies[0].supply = "vcca";
+		bt541->supplies[1].supply = "vdd";
+	}
+	error = devm_regulator_bulk_get(dev,
 					ARRAY_SIZE(bt541->supplies),
 					bt541->supplies);
 	if (error < 0) {
-		dev_err(&client->dev, "Failed to get regulators: %d\n", error);
+		dev_err(dev, "Failed to get regulators: %d\n", error);
 		return error;
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2