lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:22:39 -0700
From:   Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
        Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@....com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mwifiex: fix division by zero in fw download path

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 1:12 AM Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org> wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/usb.c
> @@ -505,6 +505,22 @@ static int mwifiex_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>                 }
>         }
>
> +       switch (card->usb_boot_state) {
> +       case USB8XXX_FW_DNLD:
> +               /* Reject broken descriptors. */
> +               if (!card->rx_cmd_ep || !card->tx_cmd_ep)
> +                       return -ENODEV;

^^ These two conditions are applicable to USB8XXX_FW_READY too, right?

> +               if (card->bulk_out_maxpktsize == 0)
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +               break;
> +       case USB8XXX_FW_READY:
> +               /* Assume the driver can handle missing endpoints for now. */
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               WARN_ON(1);
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> +

Anyway, looks pretty good, thanks:

Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ