[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXnCW1KSg2RBIdDy@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:19:23 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: opp: Allow multi-worded OPP entry names
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 12:57:18AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Not all OPP entries fit into a single word. In particular NVIDIA Tegra OPP
> tables use multi-word names where first part is freq and second voltage
> because different hardware versions use different voltages for the same
> freqs. Allow OPP entry to have multi-worded name separated by hyphen.
> This silences DT checker warnings about wrong naming scheme.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
>
> v3: - Viresh Kumar suggested that we shouldn't support postfix variant.
> I dropped variant with postfix naming scheme and multi-wording
> support of table names.
>
> v2: - In addition to a multi-wording support, support of the postfix
> *-opp-table naming scheme is added to the updated pattern.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> index ae3ae4d39843..f79343960539 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ properties:
> type: boolean
>
> patternProperties:
> - '^opp-?[0-9]+$':
> + '^opp(-[0-9]+)*$':
This drops support for cases like 'opp1' which there are a ton of. It
should be '^opp(-?[0-9]+)*$' if we want to keep that support.
I'd love to be stricter, but trying to find a balance.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists