linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] EDAC/amd64: Enumerate memory on Aldebaran GPU nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YXnThJnUuWP6Ou/D@yaz-ubuntu>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 22:32:36 +0000
From:   Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
To:     Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <nchatrad@....com>
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bp@...en8.de, mingo@...hat.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, Muralidhara M K <muralimk@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/5] EDAC/amd64: Enumerate memory on Aldebaran GPU
 nodes

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 08:20:18PM +0530, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
...
> @@ -3726,10 +3944,21 @@ static struct amd64_family_type *per_family_init(struct amd64_pvt *pvt)
>  			pvt->ops = &family_types[F17_M70H_CPUS].ops;
>  			pvt->fam_type->ctl_name = "F19h_M20h";
>  			break;
> +		} else if (pvt->model >= 0x30 && pvt->model <= 0x3f) {
> +			if (pvt->mc_node_id >= amd_cpu_node_count()) {
> +				pvt->fam_type = &family_types[ALDEBARAN_GPUS];
> +				pvt->ops = &family_types[ALDEBARAN_GPUS].ops;
> +				pvt->is_gpu = true;
> +			} else {
> +				pvt->fam_type = &family_types[F19_CPUS];
> +				pvt->ops = &family_types[F19_CPUS].ops;
> +				family_types[F19_CPUS].ctl_name = "F19h_M30h";
> +			}
> +		} else {
> +			pvt->fam_type	= &family_types[F19_CPUS];
> +			pvt->ops	= &family_types[F19_CPUS].ops;
> +			family_types[F19_CPUS].ctl_name = "F19h";
>  		}
> -		pvt->fam_type	= &family_types[F19_CPUS];
> -		pvt->ops	= &family_types[F19_CPUS].ops;
> -		family_types[F19_CPUS].ctl_name = "F19h";
>  		break;
>  

Why move these lines into the else clause above?

Thanks,
Yazen