lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 07:02:45 +0800 From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>, Rae Moar <rmr167@...il.com>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] kunit: tool: Do not error on tests without test plans On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:13 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 6:37 PM David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> wrote: > > > > The (K)TAP spec encourages test output to begin with a 'test plan': a > > count of the number of tests being run of the form: > > 1..n > > > > However, some test suites might not know the number of subtests in > > advance (for example, KUnit's parameterised tests use a generator > > function). In this case, it's not possible to print the test plan in > > advance. > > > > kunit_tool already parses test output which doesn't contain a plan, but > > reports an error. Since we want to use nested subtests with KUnit > > paramterised tests, remove this error. > > > > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com> > > Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> > > This looks to be unchanged from v1. Yeah, the changes in v2 were all in the new patches. -- David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists