[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrUb4YcnuXY9MYs+afRCFSfNdTmJAYyqHPxnqrEdFehhA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 18:04:13 -0700
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mm/hwpoison: remove race consideration
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 4:06 PM Naoya Horiguchi
<naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> From: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
>
> Now memory_failure() and unpoison_memory() are protected by mf_mutex,
> so no need to explicitly check races between them. So remove them.
It seems this patch could be folded into patch #1. Some "unlock_mutex"
were added by patch #1 then they were removed by this patch
immediately, it seems a bit of a waste and this patch is actually the
by-product of patch #1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@....com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 37 -------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 97297edfbd8e..a47b741ca04b 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -1507,14 +1507,6 @@ static int memory_failure_hugetlb(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> lock_page(head);
> page_flags = head->flags;
>
> - if (!PageHWPoison(head)) {
> - pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: just unpoisoned\n", pfn);
> - num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> - unlock_page(head);
> - put_page(head);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> /*
> * TODO: hwpoison for pud-sized hugetlb doesn't work right now, so
> * simply disable it. In order to make it work properly, we need
> @@ -1789,16 +1781,6 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
> */
> page_flags = p->flags;
>
> - /*
> - * unpoison always clear PG_hwpoison inside page lock
> - */
> - if (!PageHWPoison(p)) {
> - pr_err("Memory failure: %#lx: just unpoisoned\n", pfn);
> - num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> - unlock_page(p);
> - put_page(p);
> - goto unlock_mutex;
> - }
> if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> if (TestClearPageHWPoison(p))
> num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> @@ -2016,17 +1998,6 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
> goto unlock_mutex;
> }
>
> - /*
> - * unpoison_memory() can encounter thp only when the thp is being
> - * worked by memory_failure() and the page lock is not held yet.
> - * In such case, we yield to memory_failure() and make unpoison fail.
> - */
> - if (!PageHuge(page) && PageTransHuge(page)) {
> - unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: Memory failure is now running on %#lx\n",
> - pfn, &unpoison_rs);
> - goto unlock_mutex;
> - }
> -
> if (!get_hwpoison_page(p, flags)) {
> if (TestClearPageHWPoison(p))
> num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> @@ -2035,20 +2006,12 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
> goto unlock_mutex;
> }
>
> - lock_page(page);
> - /*
> - * This test is racy because PG_hwpoison is set outside of page lock.
> - * That's acceptable because that won't trigger kernel panic. Instead,
> - * the PG_hwpoison page will be caught and isolated on the entrance to
> - * the free buddy page pool.
> - */
> if (TestClearPageHWPoison(page)) {
> unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: Software-unpoisoned page %#lx\n",
> pfn, &unpoison_rs);
> num_poisoned_pages_dec();
> freeit = 1;
> }
> - unlock_page(page);
>
> put_page(page);
> if (freeit && !(pfn == my_zero_pfn(0) && page_count(p) == 1))
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists