[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5c43bbf7ff6c9c9ba5ac5d0a2b8a981e2abf96e.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 12:18:22 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Couple wakee flips with heavy wakers
On Wed, 2021-10-27 at 10:00 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> How about patch 2?
This version doesn't slam the door, so no worries wrt kthread/control
thread latencies etc. Doing a brief tbench vs hogs mixed load run
didn't even show much of a delta.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists