[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AS8PR04MB86769F5EBF9AF10DDC3F7AAD8C859@AS8PR04MB8676.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 01:30:02 +0000
From: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
"l.stach@...gutronix.de" <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [RESEND v2 4/5] PCI: imx6: Fix the clock reference handling
unbalance when link never came up
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 6:22 AM
> To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> Cc: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>; l.stach@...gutronix.de;
> bhelgaas@...gle.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@....com; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;
> dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kernel@...gutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [RESEND v2 4/5] PCI: imx6: Fix the clock reference handling
> unbalance when link never came up
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 02:35:36AM +0000, Richard Zhu wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2021 5:54 PM
> > > To: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@....com>
> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>; l.stach@...gutronix.de;
> > > bhelgaas@...gle.com; lorenzo.pieralisi@....com;
> > > linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>;
> > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> > > linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; kernel@...gutronix.de
> > > Subject: Re: [RESEND v2 4/5] PCI: imx6: Fix the clock reference
> > > handling unbalance when link never came up
>
> > > I hope you don't mind me asking, but how is an empty default case in
> > > the switch statement helping IMX6Q and IMX6QP? What does it achieve
> > > for these two controllers specifically?
> > >
> > [Richard Zhu] Never mind. 😊.
> > There might be following building warning if the "default:break" is removed.
> > " CC drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.o
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c: In function
> ‘imx6_pcie_clk_disable’:
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c:527:2: warning: enumeration value
> ‘IMX6Q’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]
> > 527 | switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) {
> > | ^~~~~~
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c:527:2: warning: enumeration value
> ‘IMX6QP’ not handled in switch [-Wswitch]"
>
> Sorry, I didn't see this until after asking the same question as Krzysztof.
>
> Sigh. That's a really annoying gcc warning, but I guess I won't fight it ;)
[Richard Zhu] Never mind, 😊.
BR
Richard
>
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists