linux-kernel - [PATCH][next] mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Fix spelling mistake "candiates" -> candidates

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20211027130812.426373-1-colin.i.king@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:08:12 +0100
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...glemail.com>
To:     Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] mmc: dw_mmc: exynos: Fix spelling mistake "candiates" -> candidates

There are several spelling mistakes in variable names and in a dev_warn
message. Fix these.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
index 1f8a3c0ddfe1..c2dd29ef45c6 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
@@ -442,14 +442,14 @@ static inline u8 dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(struct dw_mci *host)
 	return sample;
 }
 
-static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
+static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candidates)
 {
 	const u8 iter = 8;
 	u8 __c;
 	s8 i, loc = -1;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
-		__c = ror8(candiates, i);
+		__c = ror8(candidates, i);
 		if ((__c & 0xc7) == 0xc7) {
 			loc = i;
 			goto out;
@@ -457,7 +457,7 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
-		__c = ror8(candiates, i);
+		__c = ror8(candidates, i);
 		if ((__c & 0x83) == 0x83) {
 			loc = i;
 			goto out;
@@ -466,11 +466,11 @@ static s8 dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(u8 candiates)
 
 	/*
 	 * If there is no cadiates value, then it needs to return -EIO.
-	 * If there are candiates values and don't find bset clk sample value,
-	 * then use a first candiates clock sample value.
+	 * If there are candidates values and don't find bset clk sample value,
+	 * then use a first candidates clock sample value.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < iter; i++) {
-		__c = ror8(candiates, i);
+		__c = ror8(candidates, i);
 		if ((__c & 0x1) == 0x1) {
 			loc = i;
 			goto out;
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
 	struct dw_mci *host = slot->host;
 	struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
 	struct mmc_host *mmc = slot->mmc;
-	u8 start_smpl, smpl, candiates = 0;
+	u8 start_smpl, smpl, candidates = 0;
 	s8 found;
 	int ret = 0;
 
@@ -496,18 +496,18 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_execute_tuning(struct dw_mci_slot *slot, u32 opcode)
 		smpl = dw_mci_exynos_move_next_clksmpl(host);
 
 		if (!mmc_send_tuning(mmc, opcode, NULL))
-			candiates |= (1 << smpl);
+			candidates |= (1 << smpl);
 
 	} while (start_smpl != smpl);
 
-	found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candiates);
+	found = dw_mci_exynos_get_best_clksmpl(candidates);
 	if (found >= 0) {
 		dw_mci_exynos_set_clksmpl(host, found);
 		priv->tuned_sample = found;
 	} else {
 		ret = -EIO;
 		dev_warn(&mmc->class_dev,
-			"There is no candiates value about clksmpl!\n");
+			"There is no candidates value about clksmpl!\n");
 	}
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.32.0