linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: scan: Honor certain device identification rules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3ad75583-b37e-8700-d062-42426966d912@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 16:27:50 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: scan: Honor certain device identification
 rules

Hi,

On 10/26/21 20:51, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> There are some rules in the ACPI spec regarding which device identification
> objects can be used together etc., but they are not followed by the kernel
> code.
> 
> This series modifies the code to follow the spec more closely (see patch
> changelogs for details).

Both changes seem sensible to me; and since you make _HID take precedence
over _ADR I don't expect this to cause any regressions on BYT / CHT
hardware (the other way around will likely be an issue).

So for the series:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

Regards,

Hans