[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4af5d1e4-75cc-f5a6-8552-5a2f0f631724@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:10:27 -0500
From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: "nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com" <nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"jpoimboe@...hat.com" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"sjitindarsingh@...il.com" <sjitindarsingh@...il.com>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"live-patching@...r.kernel.org" <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 06/11] arm64: Make profile_pc() use arch_stack_walk()
On 10/24/21 9:18 PM, nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
>> Sent: Friday, October 15, 2021 11:59 AM
>> To: mark.rutland@....com; broonie@...nel.org; jpoimboe@...hat.com; ardb@...nel.org; Nobuta, Keiya/信田 圭哉
>> <nobuta.keiya@...itsu.com>; sjitindarsingh@...il.com; catalin.marinas@....com; will@...nel.org; jmorris@...ei.org;
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; live-patching@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>> madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
>> Subject: [PATCH v10 06/11] arm64: Make profile_pc() use arch_stack_walk()
>>
>> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
>>
>> Currently, profile_pc() in ARM64 code walks the stack using
>> start_backtrace() and unwind_frame(). Make it use arch_stack_walk() instead. This makes maintenance easier.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Madhavan T. Venkataraman <madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c index eebbc8d7123e..671b3038a772 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/time.c
>> @@ -32,22 +32,26 @@
>> #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
>> #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>>
>> +static bool profile_pc_cb(void *arg, unsigned long pc) {
>> + unsigned long *prof_pc = arg;
>> +
>> + if (in_lock_functions(pc))
>> + return true;
>> + *prof_pc = pc;
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> unsigned long profile_pc(struct pt_regs *regs) {
>> - struct stackframe frame;
>> + unsigned long prof_pc = 0;
>>
>> if (!in_lock_functions(regs->pc))
>> return regs->pc;
>>
>> - start_backtrace(&frame, regs->regs[29], regs->pc);
>> -
>> - do {
>> - int ret = unwind_frame(NULL, &frame);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - return 0;
>> - } while (in_lock_functions(frame.pc));
>> + arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs);
>>
>> - return frame.pc;
>> + return prof_pc;
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(profile_pc);
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>
>
> I've got build error with CONFIG_ACPI=n:
> ====
> arch/arm64/kernel/time.c: In function 'profile_pc':
> arch/arm64/kernel/time.c:52:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_stack_walk' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 52 | arch_stack_walk(profile_pc_cb, &prof_pc, current, regs);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> ====
>
> I think it should include <linux/stacktrace.h> instead of <asm/stacktrace.h>.
>
OK. I will fix this.
Thanks for catching this.
Madhavan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists