[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d0746ea4-06e9-f65d-6e45-72b1b0dea29b@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:14:44 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 35/43] KVM: SVM: Signal AVIC doorbell iff vCPU is in
guest mode
On 27/10/21 18:08, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Right, so should we drop the "if (running)" check in this patch, at the same
>> time as it's adding the IN_GUEST_MODE check?
> LOL, I think we have a Three^WTwo Stooges routine going on. This patch does
> remove avic_vcpu_is_running() and replaces it with the vcpu->mode check. Or am
> I completely misunderstanding what your referring to?
>
> - if (avic_vcpu_is_running(vcpu)) {
> + /*
> + * Signal the doorbell to tell hardware to inject the IRQ if the vCPU
> + * is in the guest. If the vCPU is not in the guest, hardware will
> + * automatically process AVIC interrupts at VMRUN.
> + */
> + if (vcpu->mode == IN_GUEST_MODE) {
> int cpu = READ_ONCE(vcpu->cpu);
Nevermind, I confused svm_deliver_avic_intr with avic_kick_target_vcpus,
which anyway you are handling in patch 36.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists