[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YXi5CUCEi7YmNxXM@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2021 21:27:21 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: reset: Add generic GPIO reset binding
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 07:49:21PM -0400, Sean Anderson wrote:
> This adds a binding for a generic GPIO reset driver. This driver is
> designed to easily add a GPIO-based reset to a driver which expected a
> reset controller. It offers greater flexibility than a reset-gpios
> property, and allows for one code path to be shared for GPIO resets and
> MMIO-based resets.
I would like to do this last part, but not requiring a binding change.
IOW, be able to register any 'reset-gpios' property as a reset provider
directly without this added level of indirection.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
> ---
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/reset/gpio-reset.yaml | 93 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/gpio-reset.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/gpio-reset.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/gpio-reset.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..de2ab074cea3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reset/gpio-reset.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR BSD-2-Clause)
GPL-2.0-only not GPL-2.0+
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/reset/gpio-reset.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Generic GPIO reset driver
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>
> +
> +description: |
> + This is a generic GPIO reset driver which can provide a reset-controller
> + interface for GPIO-based reset lines. This driver always operates with
> + logical GPIO values; to invert the polarity, specify GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW in the
> + GPIO's flags.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: gpio-reset
> +
> + '#reset-cells':
> + const: 1
> +
> + reset-gpios:
> + description: |
> + GPIOs to assert when asserting a reset. There is a one-to-one mapping
> + between the reset specifier and the index of the GPIO in this list to
> + assert.
> +
> + done-gpios:
> + description: |
> + GPIOs which indicate that the device controlled by the GPIO has exited
> + reset. There must be one done GPIO for each reset GPIO, or no done GPIOs
> + at all. The driver will wait for up to done-timeout-us for the
> + corresponding done GPIO to assert before returning.
This is odd. Do you have some examples of h/w needing this done signal?
It certainly doesn't seem like something we have a generic need for.
> +
> + pre-assert-us:
> + default: 0
> + description: |
> + Microseconds to delay between when the reset was requested to be
> + asserted, and asserting the reset GPIO
> +
> + post-assert-us:
> + default: 0
> + description: |
> + Microseconds to delay after asserting the reset GPIO and before returning
> + to the caller.
> +
> + pre-deassert-us:
> + default: 0
> + description: |
> + Microseconds to delay between when the reset was requested to be
> + deasserted, and asserting the reset GPIO
> +
> + post-deassert-us:
> + default: 0
> + description: |
> + Microseconds to delay after deasserting the reset GPIO and before
> + returning to the caller. This delay is always present, even if the done
> + GPIO goes high earlier.
> +
> + done-timeout-us:
> + default: 1000
> + description:
> + Microseconds to wait for the done GPIO to assert after deasserting the
> + reset GPIO. If post-deassert-us is present, this property defaults to 10
> + times that delay. The timeout starts after waiting for the post deassert
> + delay.
There's a reason we don't have all these timing values in DT. The timing
requirements are defined by each device (being reset) and implied by
their compatible strings. If we wanted a macro language for power
sequence timings of regulators, clocks, resets, enables, etc., then we
would have designed such a thing already.
> +
> +required:
> + - '#reset-cells'
> + - compatible
> + - reset-gpios
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
> + pcs_reset: reset-pcs {
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "gpio-reset";
> + reset-gpios = <&gpio 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> + <&gpio 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> + <&gpio 2 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>,
> + <&gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + done-gpios = <&gpio 4 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
> + <&gpio 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
> + <&gpio 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>,
> + <&gpio 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> + post-deassert-us = <100>;
> + };
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists