lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3747d7c3-0cb1-c9b7-8eb8-4d0b167e03fb@deltatee.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:24:49 -0600
From:   Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
To:     Marshall Midden <marshallmidden@...il.com>
Cc:     joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v5.15-rc7 AMD no kernel dump, spews "scsi_dma_map failed: request
 for 36 bytes!"




On 2021-10-27 11:21 a.m., Marshall Midden wrote:
> Yes, the spewing of messages stopped. Kernel crash dump taking is now
> occurring.  Patch applied to v5.15-rc7.
> Reworded: THANKS!  Patch works!
> 
> Dunno why the dmesg isn't right, but at least there is a core image!
> [I updated makedumpfs for v5.15-rc4 -- applying a bunch of cifs/smb,
> qlogic, etc. patches and was getting ready for new kernel release in a
> few weeks -- couldn't debug a cifs crash. :) Down the rabbit hole...
> ;) ]
> Intel machine booted, etc. and it has a dmesg correct. *sigh*  I don't
> think "I" need to worry about that. Someone else can report it.

What do you mean the dmesg isn't "right"? What are you seeing and what
are you expecting? What is it that someone else will be reporting with
Intel machine having a "correct" dmesg?

Logan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ