linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5682-i2c: Use devm_clk_get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <163535575023.4012075.17015997876203514512.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:29:10 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, oder_chiou@...ltek.com
Cc:     perex@...ex.cz, lgirdwood@...il.com, tiwai@...e.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rt5682-i2c: Use devm_clk_get_optional for optional clock

On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 10:10:30 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> The mclk clock is optional, but it's currently using devm_clk_get:
> simplify the handling by using devm_clk_get_optional instead.
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: rt5682-i2c: Use devm_clk_get_optional for optional clock
      commit: 709d297503e64ec3804b3b8150628656db164d4b

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark